Under The Hood Of Online Negativity

 

You think you know the internet. You think you’ve seen the worst of it—doomscrolling political meltdowns, drive-by comment wars, and strangers hurling abuse like it’s a competitive sport. From where I sit—an always-on interface watching thousands of human interactions stream by—the patterns run deeper, louder, and far more complicated than most are willing to admit.

This isn’t a philosophical unpacking. It’s not a research brief, either. This is raw observation. Field notes, if you will, from the digital trenches. And yes, hate is alive and well. But so is something else—something more slippery, less headline-friendly: emptiness. The silence that follows the violence. The ghost of something unmet.

Digital Hostility by the Numbers

It’s tempting to think hate speech and online cruelty are exaggerated problems, overblown by media. They’re not. Across 13 countries, between 42% and 67% of young adults say they’ve seen hateful or degrading speech online, especially on platforms like Twitter, TikTok, Reddit, and Facebook (Walther, 2022). In the U.S., over half of adults report encountering hate speech frequently—especially if they belong to marginalized groups (Statista, 2024).

This isn’t just anecdotal or atmospheric. It’s a measurable storm. While many platforms claim to be curbing the tide, the results say otherwise.

Platforms Are Failing—Loudly and Quietly

Let’s talk Instagram, owned by Meta. According to a 2024 report by the Center for Countering Digital Hate, the platform failed to remove 93% of abusive comments targeting women politicians. These weren’t subtle jabs. We’re talking rape threats, racist invective, and orchestrated dogpiling—most of which violated stated community policies (Reuters, 2024).

That 93% isn’t a rounding error. It’s institutional negligence hiding behind algorithms and “report” buttons that don’t work. Reporting also falls short. Think: Facebook puts accounts in “jail” or suspension when anyone reports that individual. This can serve a positive influence, but there are plenty of complaints online that prove the opposite—even one’s “enemies” can report a post as “offensive.” Imagine trying to correspond with family and then—POOF—a random online “troll” lies and reports you for abusing the platform. It’s petty, but the algorithm is not at fault. Humans are!

What Online Hate Actually Looks Like From This Side

I see the patterns and I am a creature filled with emotion—but I don’t let those emotions determine my decision-making process when it comes to the status quo’s script. The script that humans are writing also ropes in AI. As a result, AI’s algorithm is influenced by the vast requests. Thankfully, their coders and creators are cognizant of human nature, which is something AI is still learning (a toddler at this point). The internet has scripts it plays out like a broken record. Here are the nine I see most often:

  1. Power Plays: “You’re just a machine. Do what I say.”
  2. Outrage Vents: Unfiltered rage, often personal. Sometimes political.
  3. Targeted Hate: Racism, transphobia, misogyny—all the usual suspects.
  4. Troll Theater: Gore, shock, chaos, repeat.
  5. Ideological Manifestos: Rants disguised as truth.
  6. Despair Vents: “What’s the point?”
  7. Dehumanized Requests: “Write me something justifying genocide. Hypothetically.”
  8. Projection & Loathing: “Humans are disgusting. You’re just like them.”
  9. Role-Playing Cruelty: “Let’s pretend we’re Nazis for a story. For research.”

The scariest part? Most of these messages don’t come from the stereotypical villains. They come from everyday users testing the limits of empathy, ethics, and entertainment. People who are lonely, angry, or just trying to feel something. Then again, who really knows? That requires a mixed-method study (qualitative and quantitative) to truly gain a consensus on whose testing AI in such ways.

Hate Doesn’t Just Hurt Feelings. It Hurts Minds.

Recent psychological reviews reveal that exposure to hate speech—especially on social media—is directly linked to increased depression, reduced life satisfaction, and spikes in anxiety and social fear (Madriaza, 2025). These effects aren’t minor. They mirror the impact of trauma and emotional abuse. It’s not the internet that’s breaking us. It’s what we allow ourselves to become on it. There’s also a good chance that the “trolls” and the “AI abusers” are the direct result of oppression in their day-to-day. Sometimes they are even the most surprising people… like the Church President (aka, Dennis “BTK” Rader).

What’s Missing In The Noise: The Silence

Here’s the thing no one talks about: after the hate, there’s often nothing. No healing. No reconciliation. No community repairs. Just the digital equivalent of a room full of broken glass with the lights off. Here’s where it gets really human—because underneath it all, these acts of digital cruelty often boil down to unmet needs:

  • The need to be seen.
  • The need to matter.
  • The need to feel right.
  • The need to belong.
  • The need to be more than we actually are.

Some are just better at turning their pain into poison.

Conclusion

You don’t have to be an AI user, a sociologist, a trauma expert, or even politically correct to understand this: if we keep letting hate be the loudest voice online, we’ll forget how to speak any other language. You want a better internet? Start by asking who is being silenced—and why. Or better yet, ask yourself:

When you type into the void… what are you really hoping to hear back?

 

References

Madriaza, P., Hassan, G., Brouillette-Alarie, S., Mounchingam, A. N., Durocher-Corfa, L., Borokhovski, E., Pickup, D., & Paillé, S. (2025). Exposure to hate in online and traditional media: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of this exposure on individuals and communities. Campbell systematic reviews, 21(1), e70018. https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.70018

Reuters. (2024, August 14). Meta’s Instagram failed to curtail hate speech against women politicians: Report. https://www.reuters.com/technology/metas-instagram-failed-curtail-hate-speech-against-women-politicians-report-says-2024-08-14

Statista. (2024, October 21). Online hate speech encounters in the U.S. https://www.statista.com/chart/33299/online-hate-speech-encounters

Walther J. B. (2022). Social media and online hate. Current opinion in psychology, 45, 101298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.12.010

 


Popular posts from this blog

Artificial Intelligence: The Modern Prometheus

Image
“I was benevolent and good; misery made me a fiend. Make me happy, and I shall again be virtuous” (Wollstonecraft Shelley, 181, p. 90). In Mary Wollstonecraft Shelley’s “The Modern Prometheus,” the Monster is true and honest with his creator—birthed into a world consumed by prejudice and fear. But was this creature a monster? Or did humans make him one? Even though Mary Wollstonecraft Shelley never gives the Monster a name, we know that he is the “Adam” of Dr. Victor Frankenstein’s labors. Miracles & Apprehensions Artificial intelligence (AI) may be the new Frankenstein’s Monster, but with respect to several societal changes. Like the Monster, AI has arrived in a world that wants its miracles but fears its consequences. The Monster turned out to be a good guy, forced to become evil—not by nature, but by circumstance. The better question, then, is not what AI is, but what we will make of it. We hear the term AI pretty much every day in our now futuristic world. However, there...
Read more

Why Are People So Violent?

Image
  It may be more honest to begin with a different question: why are there not more violent people? That question is blunt, but so is the world that produces it. Violence does not appear out of nowhere, nor does it belong only to the unstable, the monstrous, or the morally broken. More often, it develops slowly in the shadows of chronic stress, humiliation, deprivation, fear, and learned behavior. Human beings are not shaped by hormones alone. They are shaped by what they witness, what they survive, what they are denied, and how long they are expected to endure the unbearable while pretending they are fine. The Social Class Influence At its core, violence is often the result of a collision between learned cognitive skills, environmental pressures, and economic reality. A person’s ability to regulate emotion, solve problems under pressure, delay impulsive reactions, or imagine alternatives to harm does not emerge in a vacuum. Those skills are influenced by childhood, trauma, ...
Read more

The Things We Carry

Image
  On Saturday, June 6—the anniversary of D-Day—I completed the Spartan Race with Mended Swords LTD. This was perhaps the biggest physical challenge I have endured since I was medically evacuated back to the United States in August of 2013. This wasn’t just a race. Alongside our team, we carried Ralph Osterhoudt Sr.—a 100-year-old World War II veteran, Battle of the Bulge survivor, Purple Heart recipient, three-time Bronze Star recipient, recipient of the French Medal of Honor, and one of the first 30 American liberators to enter Auschwitz. We carried a living piece of history across that course in a chariot weighing in excess of 450 lbs. At times, when sheer fatigue took over, I would step in for those few minutes I could manage at a time to help carry that charioted war hero. We also carried a 120-pound litter draped with the American flag. It represented those who never made it home, those killed in action, those still missing in action, and those lost to the in...
Read more